Vote
22
up
2
down
report video
The Magic Economics of Gambling
Wendover Productions
Posted 6 years ago by Ed in category: interesting
Comments (4)
DaveJoyce - 6 years ago [ Reply ]
0
up
0
down
The prize linked savings account idea was super intriguing! I would totally save up for that. The study he mentioned occurred in Michigan where I live but I’ve never heard of it before.

 Reply to this post:
Add comment as a guest or [ login ] to use your username

Noemoc - 6 years ago [ Reply ]
1
up
0
down
The insurance argument is wrong. I buy insurance not because I think I will come out ahead. Rather, I CAN afford to lose several thousand dollars with 100% certainty, and can plan accordingly. I can NOT afford to lose tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars. So I happily lose a manageable, plannable amount of money to be assured of not losing a huge amount of money. I know my expected value is negative dollars, but that is fine because I can plan for it. Also, for gambling, people place a value on the fun of gambling and the excitement of the POSSIBILITY of a big pay off. This entertainment value gets brought up at the end but is ignored in the beginning. I agree with Dave that the prize linked savings account is a clever idea.

 Reply to this post:
Add comment as a guest or [ login ] to use your username
DaveJoyce - 6 years ago
1
up
0
down
  I agree. The concept of insurance seems to be getting lost in the public debate. I *want* a high deductible plan because I can manage the small problems, but I don’t want to have to deal with catastrophic problems that put me in bankruptcy.  

Ch1ll1ng - 6 years ago [ Reply ]
0
up
0
down
Risk management is not gambling if you have enough money to pay for it. But if you have to seriously compromise to pay for it it becomes gambling.

 Reply to this post:
Add comment as a guest or [ login ] to use your username

Add comment as a guest or [ login ] to use your username